FTTH and HFC Modernization: Optical Transceivers Drive Network Modernization for Universal Broadband
There’s a familiar debate happening within broadband right now – Fiber to the home (FTTH) or Hybrid Fiber Coax (HFC)? While HFC has been the dominant choice for a while, especially for brownfield installations, FTTH is on the upswing with the ever-increasing innovative options that allow for fiber installs in both new builds and network upgrades around the world.
In a whitepaper from USTelecom, they advocate for a “modern regulatory environment that advances rather than undercuts tech modernization.”
The worry is that outdated regulations are placing too much emphasis on maintaining old copper networks rather than speeding universal access to reliable, high-speed internet. And while they don’t advocate for one kind of next-generation broadband network architecture over another, they make a good point.
In this blog, we’re looking at how the choice between FTTH and HFC are impacting network operators now and into the future.
Will HFC Continue to Dominate Over FTTH?
When it comes to network modernization in the U.S., FTTH and HFC networks have been locked in a seemingly never-ending popularity contest. On one hand, fiber now passes more than 88.1 million U.S. households, but coaxial cable is still currently in the top spot for delivering broadband, and understandably so. Installing an all-fiber architecture in an old commercial or residential building can be nearly impossible and costly.
But as the country continues to grow and more buildings are being built from the ground up, fiber is the top choice. Naturally, HFC’s share of the market will diminish as this rise in fiber takes over. RVA forecasts that telecom companies, cable MSOs, private competitive providers, municipalities and rural electric cooperatives will invest $150 billion on FTTH in the U.S. over the next five years, with much of that coming from BEAD program funding.
Why FTTH is Leading Network Modernization for Universal Broadband
Part of the rise in fiber’s popularity has to do with an ongoing effort to bridge the digital divide – connecting rural communities, low-income households, and underserved urban areas to high-speed data. The U.S. government has recognized that broadband service providers have been neglecting these populations because of the high cost to deploy infrastructure to these regions and is working to fix it.
The Prysmian Group forecasts that 82 million U.S. households will receive FTTH services by 2027, and according to Lightwave, 87% of network operators are planning to use fiber networks to bridge the digital gap in their areas of service.
One reason behind the growing adoption of FTTH lies in PON technology. Using passive optical components and point-to-multipoint topology, PON networks allow multiple subscribers to share the same fiber infrastructure, reducing deployment and maintenance costs. In this way, PON offers a sustainable, high bandwidth and more cost-effective (by not using active networking equipment) alternative to other broadband delivery mechanisms.
Additionally, residential and business subscribers are becoming increasingly savvy in today’s competitive markets. Based on RVA market research, 63% of internet users surveyed now say they would prefer fiber if they had a choice, versus 24% coax and 13% in favor of wireless, DSL or satellite.
With continued advancements in PON technology, FTTH has a strong future as network operators bridge the digital divide in regions where high-speed connectivity is essential. After all, bridging the digital divide means giving underserved, rural subscribers the same opportunities as their urban counterparts to access advanced applications from telemedicine to cloud services.
How DOCSIS 4.0 is Helping HFC Networks Compete with FTTH
The cable industry is facing challenges with growing its broadband subscribers considering the competition coming from fiber. From extended DOCSIS 3.1 to DOCSIS 4.0, the cable industry is working to keep pace with the PON FTTH sector. Both DOCSIS 3.1 and 4.0 provide 10 Gbps of downstream capacity, ten times more than DOCSIS 3.0. On the upstream side of the equation, DOCSIS 3.1 offers 1-2 Gbps or capacity while DCOSIS 4.0 boosts this up to 6 Gbps. That’s exponentially greater than DOCSIS 3.0’s upstream capacity of 200 Mbps.
Whereas DOCSIS 3.0 has mainly been used for lower-bandwidth applications like video conferencing or online training, DOCSIS 4.0 is ideal for situations requiring high upstream speeds like healthcare, video conferencing, IoT, online learning, virtual reality and much more. Even though FTTH adoption continues to accelerate, HFC networks are still a vital part of delivering universal, high-speed broadband across the United States.
Why Optical Transceivers Are Important for Fiber and HFC Networks
Optical transceivers are the critical pillars upon which any kind of network architecture relies on. For FTTH and XGS-PON networks, for example, optical transceivers in use must support 10 Gbps data rates for both upstream and downstream traffic. Common form factors include SFP, SFP-DD, SFP+ and XFP. Thanks to the relatively simple upgrade pathway from GPON to XGS-PON and the use of XGS/GPON Combo SFP+ and SFP-DD transceivers, it’s possible to offer both XGS-PON and GPON services over the same network. That just adds to the scalability inherent in fiber-based networks.
When it comes to HFC networks and extended spectrum DOCSIS and DOCSIS 4.0, optical transceivers become incredibly important. Extended Spectrum 1.8 GHz DOCSIS 4.0, leveraging remote PHY 2×2 nodes, will need 25 Gbps optical links to support bandwidth demands from end-users. With talk of 3 GHz DOCSIS (unnamed, but potentially DOCSIS 4.1 or 5) already underway, optical transceivers capable of supporting 25 Gbps in HFC networks are becoming critical.
The problem lies in the link distance and performance trade-off. Chromatic dispersion limits conventional 25G optics to distances of between 10-15km unless specialized equipment is used. But that makes HFC networks even less cost-effective relative to fiber (i.e., PON, FTTH). After all, at bandwidths of 10G, chromatic dispersion only limits network links to approximately 80km.
That’s where our Genesee™ Dispersion Compensation ASIC-enabled (application-specified integrated circuit) technology comes in. Leveraging this, we’ve innovated a cutting-edge, 25G tunable module that enables users to reach distances of 40km and beyond without needing specialized equipment. With groundbreaking technology like this, HFC network operators can inject a new boost of vitality into their architectures as they compete with PON technology and FTTH architectures.
Embracing FTTH and HFC to Connect Our Digital World
As the world becomes increasingly digital, the demand for high-speed broadband and universal access from urban to rural communities continues to grow. Whether addressing this through FTTH deployments or HFC upgrades, look to suppliers who have the solutions and innovations you need to turn your goals into reality. From developing innovative solutions that pass rigorous tests to providing systems integration expertise and ongoing customer support, Belden and its broadband brands can support you.
This blog was originally published on August 14, 2024, and was updated on November 6, 2025.


